Remember that Honolulu had a team in the WFL in the 70s, and there were logistical problems. The University of Hawaii football team gets to host an extra game to cover their travel costs to the mainland, so any NFL team would always have to host 9 games each season. You would probably have to put two teams from the same market in the same division to even out the schedule.

London doesn't need a NFL TEAM, SAN Antonio Yes.

As a Lions fan, that joke was funny af! Sometimes even i forget

We had a joke in Texas during the Oiler days:

In my opinion the biggest challenge of expanding to 36 or 40 teams is to create a new good working schedule formula. I tried it a bit but the results never made me happy about it.

San Antonio and Austin should team up and share one team. Call them the TEXAS OUTLAWS so no one city gets recognition. Plus build the stadium in the middle like in New Braunfels. While the new stadium is under construction the team can play 4 home games at the Alamodome and 4 in DKR to build the fan base.

Recently Roger Goodell said that Europe has the market for 4 teams, London alone could support 2. If I had to pick 4 Euro teams if there is credence to that comment, I'd have London, 2 German teams and either Amsterdam or Brussels. I think Paris could maybe sneak in based on just size and money but the NFL hasn't really been pushing that one as an option.

San diego needs a nfl team again

So glad you put Norfolk we need something exciting over here!

St Louis and San Antonio need one

I think a London expansions team should come with another team in Europe, I nominate Munich. We’ve already seen the wild success of the Germany game and apparently the NFL is super popular over there. Plus there’s a huge US military base over there, so it could give the opportunity to give the troops another taste of home while on duty.